Congress has finally completed the finishing touches on the Modified Compensation and Position Classification System or SSL 3, shortly before its scheduled recess on June 5th.
The salary standardization measure officially known as Joint Resolution No. 36, was passed by the House of Representatives on May 21st. The same measure was passed by the Senate on May 28th with a few but significant revisions. After which the bicameral conference committee met to harmonize both versions of the Joint Resolution. The bicameral conference committee report by June 3rd.
Here are some of the most important features of the Joint Resolution:
Title - "JOINT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES TO MODIFY THE COMPENSATION AND POSITION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN THE GOVERNMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE SAME INITIALLY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES". The word "AUTHORIZING" was inserted in lieu of "URGING" as originally proposed, the reason being that the power to prescribed a standardized compensation scheme is vested with Congress but is being delegated to the President.
Salary Schedule - The 33 salary grade system is maintained with the same eight (8) steps per salary grade (SG-1 is just the same, allocated to Utility Worker 1 and SG-33 being assigned to the President). From the original proposal of P8,000 monthly minimum rate, JR 36 increases said minimum rate to P9,000 per month.
Effectivity - For the national government, GOCCs and GFIs, the salary increase takes effect July 1, 2009. For LGUs, the effectivity is moved to January 1, 2010. This is surprisingly different from the DBM proposal as contained in the draft joint resolution which is July 1st.
Mode of Implementation - For the national government, the implementation of the salary difference (present rate of the incumbent vis-a-vis the adjusted rate in the same step and salary grade in the revised salary schedule) shall be spread equally in four (4) years. In the case of GOCCs, GFIs and LGUs, the same computation of salary differential shall be applied except that the implementation period shall be dependent on their finances but should at least be carried out in four (4) years. This means that GOCC, GFI and LGU personnel would be able to receive in full their salary increase beyond the four- year period as their finances warrant and that the salary differentials may vary from year to year.
Total Compensation Framework - The joint resolution classifies the compensation received by government personnel into four (4) categories namely: Basic Pay including Step Increments, Standard Allowances and Benefits, Specific-Purpose Allowances and Benefits and Incentives.
No diminution in pay - The joint resolution guarantees that there will be no diminution in benefits being received and those yet to be received by government personnel. Some benefits however, such as hazard pay, need to be rationalized.
Reinvention of some benefits - The step increment due to meritorious performance shall be revived but the Productivity Incentive Bonus (PIB) will be done away with. In the same manner, the "Extra Cash Gift" or "Performance Bonus" shall be replaced by "performance Enhancement Incentive". The CNA incentive is retained but this will no longer be charged against savings. As introduced by Sen. Mar Roxas, the funds needed to pay CNA Incentive shall be provided for in the yearly budget.
Bad news for LGUs - As initiated in the House of Representatives and concurred by the Senate, the salaries of LGU personnel shall be determined by their respective Sanggunians, and if their finances warrant, salary or wage increase may be granted subject to the personal services limitation prescribed in the 1991 Local Government Code.
13 comments:
Ive heard that in this new SSL teachers specializing in science and mathematics will be receiving salaries 3 steps higher than what their rank have stipulated. In lieu of this, I was wondering if those professionals teaching sciences, math and engg in SUC were included in this measure? Nice Post. Thanks
That is right. Teachers handling science and mathematics classes will receive an adjusted pay up to 3 steps higher. This was proposed by Sen. Pia Cayetano. Joint Resolution 36 did not qualify whether these teachers are in the elementary, secondary or tertiary level. This will be a bit clearer once the implementing guidelines will be issued by the DBM.
Just got hold of the guidelines for the first tranche and there were no mention of the special provision that teachers in science and math will receive a special salary.
Th DBM will issue a separate circular to implement the adjustment of teachers specializing in science and math.
Sir, any news regarding this separate circular for teachers in math and sciences? Thanks!
The DBM is finalizing the circular to implement the upgrading of certain classes of positions mentioned in JR 4. We will post this as soon as it is available.
sir, we received a deped regional memorandum here in region VII to submit the list of science and math teachers entitled to the 3 step increments. does this mean the dbm has already released a circular regarding this matter? what about teachers teaching other subjects?
sir, do you think that it is fair that only math and science teachers only receive a 3 steps higher salary? in fact math, science and other subject teachers are teaching in the same manner.
Sir i would like to express my comments regarding the new law promulgating the 3 steps increments of the science and math teachers. what i have foreseen in this matter is it will only cause chaos to the teachers most especially to those majoring other subject areas... it goes to show the existence of BIASES... where is justice now??? please i am waiting for your positive response in this matter... thanx...
we're waiting for the separate guidelines of the proposed 3 steps higher in salaries of math and science teachers
DBM has not yet issued the circular to implement the in-step adjustment of teachers specializing in Science and Math. The Memorandum of DepEd RO VI is pro active - in anticipation of the circular -among others, to determine the number of positions covered and the funding requirement fore the purpose.
The observation of nyne and Master Julcon is valid. Just to set things straight: the in-step adjustment was not DBM's initiative. It was introduced in the Senate during its deliberation by Senator Cayetano. The way I understood it, (reading thru the Senate Journal), it was a compromise to break the deadlock because of the insistence of the Senator to set the minimum grade allocation of teaching positions to SG 15 from SG 11 as originally proposed. Its rationale is that this will address one MDG goal.
I hope that the tertiary level will be included and those teaching applied sciences like engineering. If this group will not be included it will certainly create disturbance in the promotion and salary scheme.
Post a Comment